Why Fénelon Said Spiritual Progress Cannot Be Measured
⏱ 8 min read
You keep auditing your spiritual life and the audit always tells you you are failing. The form is the same most weeks — the small inward review at the end of a day or the start of one, the running of yourself against an internal list of what a faithful Christian woman ought to look like, the quiet verdict at the bottom of the column. The verdict is unkind and you have come to expect it.
François Fénelon, writing letters of spiritual direction from the French court in the late seventeenth century, spent a great deal of Spiritual Progress gently dismantling exactly this audit. His pastoral case — made slowly, across a hundred small letters to women like you — is that the soul cannot be measured by the soul that lives in it, because the instrument of the audit is the same instrument that needs the measuring done to it, and the verdict it returns is therefore less news from God than echo of the woman’s own anxious self. Fénelon’s whole correction of the fenelon spiritual self examination habit is to move the judgment off your desk and back onto God’s, where it always belonged. The Everspring Bible Study Workbook for Women was built as a daily home for that quieter, un-audited reading — one short page, one slow line of scripture, no scorecard underneath. For now, the Fénelon text.
The audit that always returns the same verdict
The audit feels like accountability and acts like accusation. You sit down at the end of the day and run through the list — did I pray enough, did I read enough, was I patient with the children, was I generous with my husband, did I waste the afternoon — and the answer to most of the items is no, or not enough, and the cumulative not enough becomes the daily verdict. The verdict has been the same for years. The list has been the same for years. The soul, doing the auditing, has not been changed by the auditing — it has only been wearied by it.
Fénelon noticed, in the women he was directing, that the audit was producing the opposite of what the audit was meant to produce. The intent was holiness; the effect was self-occupation. The instrument of the audit was the self; the data of the audit was the self; the verdict of the audit was rendered against the self; and the soul, the whole time, was rotated inward toward the self instead of upward toward God. The fenelon spiritual self examination he is correcting is not the existence of self-examination but its direction — the inward-rotated soul auditing its own performance instead of the upward-rotated soul abiding in God.
The first passage: the harsh watchfulness
“If, then, we never lost sight of the presence of God, we should never cease to watch, and always with a simple, lovely, quiet and disinterested vigilance; while, on the other hand, the watchfulness which is the result of a desire to be assured of our state, is harsh, restless, and full of self.”
— François Fénelon, Spiritual Progress
Read it twice. The line is doing a great deal of pastoral work in very few words.
Fénelon names two watchfulnesses. The first — simple, lovely, quiet and disinterested — is the watchfulness of the soul that has not lost sight of the presence of God. It is not measuring itself; it is simply with Him, and the watchfulness flows naturally from the being-with. The second watchfulness — harsh, restless, and full of self — is the watchfulness of the soul auditing itself for proof that it is alright with God. The two look similar from the outside. They are utterly different from the inside. One is rotated toward God and watches itself only as a byproduct. The other is rotated toward the self and uses the language of watchfulness as cover for a chronic, anxious self-occupation.
The audit that always returns failing is the second watchfulness. Fénelon does not tell you to abandon vigilance. He tells you to change which way the soul is rotated. The first watchfulness watches because the eye is on God. The second watchfulness watches because the eye is on the self. Only the first produces real growth. The second produces the harsh restlessness you have been carrying for years.
The second passage: the un-affrighted soul
“We court the reproach of Christ Jesus, and dwell in peace though surrounded by uncertainties; the judgments of God do not affright us, for we abandon ourselves to them, imploring his mercy according to our attainments in confidence, sacrifice, and absolute surrender.”
— François Fénelon, Spiritual Progress
The judgments of God do not affright us. This is the line to keep near the page.
Notice how the line lands when you let it stay slow. The judgments of God — the actual, ultimate, eternal evaluation of your soul — do not frighten the woman who has handed her case to Him. The reason is not that the soul has earned a good verdict. The reason is that the soul has stopped trying to render the verdict for itself. The case is His to decide. The mercy is His to give. The soul, having abandoned itself to His judgment, lives in peace though surrounded by uncertainties — including the deepest uncertainty of all, which is whether the soul itself is doing well.
This is the structural move Fénelon is making against the audit. The audit assumes that you must know, at all times, whether you are doing well — and that knowing is your job. Fénelon corrects: the knowing is not your job. The judgment belongs to God. Your job is to abandon yourself to His judgment, to implore mercy in plain language, and to live in peace inside the uncertainty about your own state. The soul that is judged by God, not by self-audit, can rest. The soul that insists on auditing itself first will never rest, because the audit will always find more to grade.
A pause for the body
Set the page down for a moment. Notice the small clench in the chest that has probably tightened while you were reading. The audit lives in the body before it lives in the mind — a small held breath, a slight forward lean, the shoulders raised by an inch in anticipation of the next failing verdict. Let the breath out, slowly. Let the shoulders drop. Let the chest soften.
The audited woman has been physically braced for years against her own verdict. The soul that has handed the judgment back to God can let the chest soften, because the verdict is no longer being rendered hourly by her own internal court. The body knows when the audit has been set down. The body is allowed to know.
The third passage: fidelity unsustained by delights
“God does not call you by any lively emotions, and I heartily rejoice at it, if you will but remain faithful; for a fidelity, unsustained by delights, is far purer, and safer from danger, than one accompanied by those tender feelings, which may be seated too exclusively in the imagination.”
— François Fénelon, Spiritual Progress
Read it slowly. There is enormous comfort in what Fénelon is saying here, hidden behind the seventeenth-century cadence.
Half the verdicts the audit returns are based on the absence of lively emotions — you did not feel near to God in prayer, you did not feel moved by the verse, you did not feel anything during worship — and the audit reads the absence of feeling as the absence of God. Fénelon corrects, gently and decisively. A fidelity, unsustained by delights, is far purer. The soul that is faithful without feeling anything is closer to mature than the soul whose faithfulness depends on the felt emotions of the moment. The audit, in mistaking absence of feeling for absence of God, has been grading you on the wrong column entirely. The fenelon spiritual self examination he is teaching does not measure the soul by its felt warmth. It does not measure the soul at all. It rests the soul in fidelity, regardless of the day’s weather.
If you have walked the related ground in the slow growth Fénelon said doesn’t feel like growth, the same thesis is there in a different form. And if the audit feeds, as it often does, on the dry-middle sense that you should be further along by now, why Fénelon said the Christian’s hardest year is year three is the sibling read. The surrender underneath the whole move belongs in the Murray strand too — the prayer Andrew Murray said most Christians never pray walks the same hand-over-the-case posture in a different dialect.
What replaces the audit
You do not need a better measuring system. You need to stop measuring. Fénelon’s correction is not a new metric — it is the un-rotation of the soul away from itself and toward the One who actually holds your case.
Practically: when the audit starts up at the end of the day, set it down. Name to God, in plain language, what was hard. Implore mercy in the unembarrassed way imploring mercy used to mean before it became archaic. Place yourself, again, in His hands. Refuse to render a verdict on yourself. The verdict is His. You are no longer the judge in your own court. The relief, when it lands, is not the relief of having passed the audit. It is the relief of having stepped out of the courtroom entirely.
Fénelon thought this in 1690. We plan to reprint his letters, slowly, through Everspring Press in the coming years.
Get Seven Days of Stillness — free
A free gift from Hayley Louisa Mark. A short devotional companion drawn from the 140-Day series — seven passages, seven contemplative practices, sent to your inbox over the coming week.
No noise. No spam. Unsubscribe whenever you wish.
A daily page that does not audit you
The slow practice we just walked has its 140-day form in Bible Study Workbook for Women. One short page per day, scripture pre-printed, space for the un-audited soul to sit with God without rendering a verdict on itself. For the woman whose internal court has been in session for years and is ready, now, to adjourn it.
A slow read in the wider Fénelon arc. Sibling pieces: what Fénelon said about spiritual progress that modern Christians miss and the slow growth Fénelon said doesn’t feel like growth. For the deeper-life thread underneath the un-audit, see what Andrew Murray meant by the deeper Christian life.
