Andrew Murray on Saying No to Yourself for Christ’s Sake

Andrew Murray on Saying No to Yourself for Christ’s Sake

⏱ 10 min read

You are confused by the self-care / self-denial tension, and you do not know which side is right. One stream of the modern Christian conversation tells you that the soul cannot pour from an empty cup, that you owe yourself rest, that the denying of your needs is the slow harm done to you in the name of God. Another stream — older, longer, with the weight of the centuries behind it — tells you to deny yourself daily and take up the cross. Both sound true. Neither lets you breathe. You suspect the resolution exists, but you have not heard it spoken in a way that lets the two halves of the inward life sit down at the same table.

Andrew Murray wrote The School of Obedience in a season when the same confusion was already beginning to surface in the Christian conversation, and his answer — slow, careful, almost startlingly tender — is the one this essay walks. The Everspring Prayer Journal for Women is the 140-day companion this essay opens the door of — a place where what is Christian self denial gets walked out across small daily portions, in the very week the confusion is most active in your inward life. For now — read slowly. The resolution is real.

Murray’s reading of self-denial does not contradict the modern instinct toward proper care. It re-locates it. The self-denial he is naming is not the cancellation of legitimate need. It is the saying-no to the small managing self — the inward part of you that has been holding the centre of your life by self-effort — so that the real you, the one God made and intends to feed, can finally come out from under the management and be properly held. Self-denial as freedom, not restriction. That is the frame the rest of the essay walks.

The first passage: the giving up of oneself to be ruled

The line that names what Murray is actually after, more clearly than any other in his work on self-denial, is the one he writes about what the surrendered soul is actually giving up — and what it is receiving in exchange:

Read it twice. Slowly. Notice the destination of the giving-up.

Resting in the arms of Everlasting Love. The self-denial Murray is naming is not a vacuum where the self used to be. It is an exchange — the giving up of the small self-management that has been exhausting you, in return for the being held the management was the inadequate substitute for. The no-to-self is not a no to your legitimate needs. It is a no to the inward part of you that has been trying to meet those needs by self-effort, in the absence of trust that they could be met any other way.

This is the first move in Murray’s reading, and the move the modern reader most needs to slow down at. The small managing self — the one that wakes at four in the morning to run the household in its head, that pre-checks every conversation for relational landmines, that performs spiritual maturity in front of other women, that holds the day together with the inward equivalent of clenched teeth — that is the self Murray is asking you to deny. Not the self that needs sleep. Not the self that needs honest food and honest rest. Not the self that needs friendship and dignity and a body cared for. The small managing self is the false self the genuine one has been hiding underneath. Saying no to yourself for Christ’s sake, in Murray’s reading, is the small daily release of the management — so that the genuine self, the one God made and intends to feed, can finally surface and be fed by the One who alone can feed her properly.

Blessed rest. The destination of the self-denial is not restriction. It is rest. The relinquishment of the small managing self is, functionally, the cessation of the exhausting work she has been doing — and the cessation reveals, underneath, a self that can be cared for from a different source. The arms of Everlasting Love do not feed the false self. They feed the real one. The self-denial Murray names is the removal of the false self that has been getting in the way of the real one being properly held.

This is the freedom in the freedom-not-restriction reading. The self that gets denied is the false one — the one whose denial actually relieves you. The self that gets held is the real one — the one whose holding actually feeds you. The modern self-care conversation has been, in part, an honest protest against teaching that asked the wrong self to be denied. Murray’s reading corrects the teaching without dismissing the protest. The right self is being released, and the right self is being held, and the two motions are not opposed — they are the same motion, walked from the inside.

The somatic — locating the false self in your own body

Pause here. The teaching has a body to it, and the false self lives closer to the body than most modern readers know.

Sit somewhere quiet. Notice the small ongoing effort the body has been making to hold the day together — the slight bracing in the shoulders, the small tightness in the jaw, the low-grade clench at the base of the ribcage. The bracing is the small managing self in her body-form. She has been keeping the day from falling apart by a small ongoing inward effort that the body has been carrying for her.

Now, very gently, stop the small effort. Not by trying to relax — the trying is more management — but by letting the holding stop for one breath. Let the shoulders lower by an inch. Let the jaw release. Let the breath go further on the exhale than the inhale. The body has been carrying the management; the letting-stop is the inward correlate of Murray’s self-denial. You are not denying yourself a need. You are denying the false self the small ongoing job of holding you up. Underneath the bracing, the real self — the one that needs the rest and the care and the honest food — is still there, and now there is room for her to be held by a different source. Stay with the letting-stop for a minute. Then take one slow exhale, and continue reading. The body has just walked the first half of Murray’s self-denial. The second half is the inward acknowledgement that the holding the false self was doing is now being done by a different set of arms.

The second passage: obedience the path to freedom

The second passage Murray sets next to this one — and the one that completes his account of why self-denial is freedom rather than restriction — is from The School of Obedience itself, where he writes the sentence that holds the whole frame together:

Slow down at obedience on earth is the key to a place in God’s love in heaven.

This is the line that names why the self-denial frees rather than restricts. The kept commandment is not a restriction the soul endures in order to please an exacting God. It is the opening of the inward room in which divine love is actually experienced. If ye keep My commandments, ye shall abide in My love. The cause and effect run in the direction the modern reader does not expect. The obedience is not the price of the love; the obedience is the door through which the love becomes the soul’s lived environment. The denial of the false self — and the keeping of the small commandment the false self would have refused — is the small daily act that opens the room the real self has been quietly hungry to live in.

This is why Murray can call self-denial freedom without contradiction. The false self that gets denied was a prison — the small ongoing self-management, the performance of competence, the inward isolation of having to hold everything alone. The kept commandment, the small no to the false self, is the key — the inward act that releases the door and lets the soul into the abiding the love has been waiting to fill. What is Christian self denial, in Murray’s plain reading, is this: the small daily no to the false managing self, kept by ordinary obedience to the small thing the day puts in front of you, which functions inwardly as the door into the rest the real self has been longing for the whole time. The denial is not the cost of the love. The denial is the gate through which the love arrives.

(The slow daily form of this is what the Prayer Journal for Women is built to hold — one short page each evening for the small kept yes, one honest sentence about the false self that wanted to do the holding instead. The sibling essays What Andrew Murray Meant by Absolute Surrender, Andrew Murray on the Surrendered Will, and Why Andrew Murray Said Self-Will Is the Root of All Sin walk the all-or-nothing, the obedience-side, and the diagnostic of the same teaching. If you have been carrying things the false self has been refusing to put down, a ‘let it go’ mom journal is the practical companion to the inward release. If you are reading this from a long stretch of spiritual dryness, part of what may be happening is that the false self has been doing the spiritual work and the real self has been quietly going thirsty.)

The line worth keeping near the page

If you take only one sentence from Murray into the week ahead, take this one:

Write it small. Put it where the false self is most active — the morning of the difficult day, the evening of the long inward management, the moment the small managing voice begins its low-grade running commentary about what you should be doing differently. The self-denial is not the no to your legitimate need. It is the no to the small managing self that has been getting in the way of your legitimate need being met. The denial frees. The kept obedience is the door. The arms of Everlasting Love are the room. (Everspring Press intends, in time, to bring The School of Obedience back into print as part of the slow Murray reading library; this essay is part of the working library the reprint will be built on.)

Get Seven Days of Stillness — free

A free gift from Hayley Louisa Mark. A short devotional companion drawn from the 140-Day series — seven passages, seven contemplative practices, sent to your inbox over the coming week.

Send me the seven days →

No noise. No spam. Unsubscribe whenever you wish.


The slow practice we just walked has its 140-day form in Prayer Journal for Women.

Similar Posts