Why You Can’t Let Go Until You Name It — De Sales on Surrender
⏱ 12 min read
You have tried to let it go. You have prayed the prayers about surrender. You have used the language — I give it to You, Lord. I lay it down. I trust You with it. And then, half an hour later, the weight is back in your chest exactly where it was before the prayer, in the same shape, with the same temperature, behaving as if no prayer had been said.
This is the quiet failure of the surrender language as most of us inherited it. Letting go has become a generic spiritual verb — applied to everything, attached to no specific thing — and the soul cannot let go of a thing it has not first named. The unnamed weight cannot be laid down, because there is no surface in the soul on which a vague it can be set. You can only hand over what you have first held distinctly enough to know what it is.
This essay is a slow reading of Francis de Sales — the seventeenth-century bishop and spiritual director whose Introduction to the Devout Life has been on the shelf of contemplatives for four hundred years — on the question of how to truly let go and trust God. De Sales is not interested in the generic surrender prayer. He is interested in what comes before it. He is interested in the naming. The naming, in his reading, is half the work — and it is the half nearly every modern surrender practice skips. The slow practice this essay walks has its 140-day form in the Devotional for Women in Their 40s, built so the naming has a page-shape and the surrender does not have to be performed each evening from scratch.
What follows is the contemplative version of the work. Not the bright bumper-sticker let go and let God, but the slower thing the old saints meant — the immolation, the laying down, the I salute thee, O precious cross spoken to the actual weight, by its actual name, with the affections finally engaged because the thing has finally been seen.
The unnamed weight, and why it does not move
Begin with what you have been carrying. Not in the abstract. The actual thing. The one that has been sitting low in the chest for three months, or eight months, or a year. The one that wakes you at 4am. The one that is underneath the surface irritation you keep apologising for to people who do not know you are also carrying this.
If you cannot name it in one sentence, that is the diagnosis. The unnamed weight is the one that does not move when you pray. The mind has a word for it — stress, anxiety, this season, the thing with my mother, the situation at work — but the word is a wrapper. Underneath the wrapper is a more specific thing the soul has not been allowed to name, often because the naming would force a reckoning the daylight has been postponing.
The marriage has been hollow for two years and I do not know if I can keep this up. I am quietly afraid my child is not okay. I have been performing wellness because the alternative is admitting I am not. I love my work and I am also being slowly destroyed by it. My mother is dying and there is something I never said. The named sentence is jagged. It has a particular shape. It is uncomfortable to say even to yourself, which is why you have been carrying it as a vague it instead.
De Sales, who spent his life as a spiritual director writing letters to women carrying exactly these kinds of weights, did not skip this step. The Introduction to the Devout Life is full of small, exacting work on what the soul is actually carrying before it asks the soul to let anything go. He understood, in a way modern surrender language has forgotten, that the affections cannot release what the intellect has not first seen.
The naming is not therapy. It is not introspection for its own sake. It is the necessary precondition of an honest surrender. The thing has to become visible to be laid down. Otherwise, what is being handed to God is a wrapper, and the actual weight stays where it has been.
The first line — de Sales on the language of love and resistance
Here is the first of the three passages worth keeping near the page. De Sales is writing to a soul in spiritual dryness — the very state in which the unnamed weight has accumulated most heavily — and he gives her, in the same breath, both the language of intimate address to God and the instruction to resist what is dragging the soul down:
But when you pray let your words and affections, whether interior or exterior, all tend to love and trust in God. “O God of Mercy, most Loving Lord, Sweet Saviour, Lord of my heart, my Joy, my Hope, my Beloved, my Bridegroom.” Vigorously resist all tendencies to melancholy, and although all you do may seem to be done coldly, wearily and indifferently, do not give in. The Enemy strives to make us languid in doing good by depression, but when he sees that we do not cease our efforts to work, and that those efforts become all the more earnest by reason of their being made in resistance to him, he leaves off troubling us.
— Francis de Sales, Introduction to the Devout Life
Notice what he does not say. He does not say pray the surrender prayer and the weight will lift. He says, in effect, name the One you are addressing, and keep naming Him, even when it is cold and weary and feels like nothing. The Lord of my heart, my Joy, my Hope, my Beloved — that is the practice de Sales prescribes. The naming of God by His names. Specifically. Slowly. Even — especially — when the soul is dry and the words taste of dust.
The reason this matters for the question of letting go is this: the soul cannot hand the weight to a generic God any more than it can let go of a generic it. The surrender requires a specific One on one side and a specific something on the other. De Sales gives the specificity on God’s side — Sweet Saviour, Lord of my heart, my Joy, my Hope, my Beloved, my Bridegroom — and the surrender requires that you provide the same specificity on the side of what is being laid down.
When the surrender prayer fails, it is almost always because one side or the other was vague. I give it to You, Lord is vague on both sides. Father of mercies, I am laying down the specific fear that my daughter will not come home this Christmas, and the older fear underneath it that I have already lost her is the kind of sentence the soul can actually offer. The first is a wrapper. The second is the real exchange.
The somatic moment — feeling for the weight in the body
Pause here. Set the screen down for a breath. The body knows what the mind has been protecting itself from naming. Bring one hand to the chest, just below the collarbone. Notice what is there. Most often there is a small tightness — a low, weighted feeling, a band that has been sitting across the upper chest for weeks. Stay with the hand for one slow inhale and one slow exhale. Do not try to move the weight. Just notice it is there. The body has been carrying the unnamed thing while the mind has been finding ways not to look at it. The naming the rest of this essay is asking for begins, sometimes, with this exact gesture — the hand on the place that has been holding the weight, and the slow honest noticing that something is here. The word for what it is will come. The first work is just letting the body show you it has been there.
The second line — the immolation that is not generic
The second passage from de Sales — this one from the Treatise on the Love of God, which is the longer cousin of the Introduction, but it is the same author and the same voice — is one of the most specific descriptions of surrender in all of the spiritual writings:
Whereupon, representing to himself the greatness of the pains, toils and hazards which it would be incumbent on him to undergo in that behalf, he immolated himself in spirit to God’s good-pleasure, and tenderly kissing this his cross, he cried from the bottom of his heart, in imitation of S. Andrew: “I salute thee, O precious cross, I salute thee, O blessed tribulation! O holy affliction, how delightful thou art, since thou didst issue from the loving breast of this Father of eternal mercy, who willed thee from all eternity, and ordained thee for my dear people and me!”
— Francis de Sales, Treatise on the Love of God
Read what he is describing. The surrender is not a generic yes Lord. It is, first, representing to himself the greatness of the pains, toils and hazards — that is, the explicit, deliberate, slow seeing of what is being surrendered. The man in the passage is not laying down a vague situation. He is naming, in his own mind, exactly what the cost will be — the pains, the toils, the hazards. He is letting his imagination walk the full shape of the weight before he lays it down.
Only after the seeing does the surrender come. And the surrender, when it comes, is not bland. It is — astonishingly — tender. Tenderly kissing this his cross. I salute thee, O precious cross. The soul that has named the weight, in de Sales’s reading, does not lay it down with gritted teeth. It lays it down with affection — because what it has finally seen is that the weight came from the loving breast of this Father of eternal mercy, was willed from all eternity, and ordained for my dear people and me.
The tender surrender is not available to the soul that has skipped the naming. You cannot kiss a cross you have refused to look at. You can only hold a vague resentment of an unnamed weight. The whole of de Sales’s slow contemplative method is in this passage — see the thing precisely, recognise it as ordained from the Father’s loving breast, lay it down with affection rather than grim resolve. This is what real letting go looks like. The bumper-sticker version has none of this in it.
This is also why the Devotional for Women in Their 40s is built around small daily pages that ask, gently, what is being carried today rather than what should be released today. The naming is the slow work, and the surrender follows the naming when the naming has been honest. The book gives the practice a daily room, with scripture pre-printed and one slow line for the honest sentence — so the soul that has been carrying the unnamed thing for months can begin, finally, to put words to it. Not to fix it. To see it. (For the wider de Sales tradition on the verb underneath this whole posture, what does absolute surrender mean — Andrew Murray’s plain reading is the sister essay, and letting go and letting God — what the phrase actually means walks the bumper-sticker phrase back into something the contemplatives would recognise.)
The third line — the soul that has finally moved through
Once the naming is done, and the surrender has been made with the affections engaged, de Sales describes the soul that comes through on the other side. Not victorious. Not problem-solved. Belonging. Here is the third passage:
As for example, the soul having long dwelt in the feeling of the union whereby she sweetly tastes how happy she is to belong to God, in fine, augmenting this union by an amorous pressing and moving forwards: Yea, Lord, will she say, I am thine, all, all, all, without reserve; or: Ah Lord! I am so indeed, and will be daily ever more; or, by way of prayer: O sweet Jesus! Ah! draw me still more deeply into thy heart, that thy love may devour me, and that I may be swallowed up in its sweetness.
— Francis de Sales, Treatise on the Love of God
Yea, Lord, I am thine, all, all, all, without reserve. Notice that this is not the opening line of the surrender. It is the line that comes after the soul has long dwelt in the feeling of the union. The all, all, all, without reserve is the fruit of the slow work, not the opening prayer. You do not start the surrender at this sentence. You arrive at this sentence after months — sometimes years — of the slow naming, the slow seeing, the small daily handing-over of the named thing.
This is why the modern let go and let God often does not hold. It tries to begin where de Sales says one ends. The soul is asked to make the full all, all, all, without reserve surrender on day one, with a weight it has not named, addressed to a God whose names it has not slowly invoked. The surrender does not stick, because it has not been built. The de Sales path is the building. (If the weight you are carrying is the depleted-woman kind — the kind that has been quietly stacking through a long hard season — self-care ideas for Christian women in hard seasons is the letter to the worn, and when you feel spiritually dry — the practice for the year God goes quiet walks the dryness in which the naming is most needed and least possible.)
So — how do I truly let go?
You name the thing. By itself. In one sentence. With the actual word for what it is, not the wrapper.
You name the One you are handing it to. By His names. Father of mercies. Sweet Saviour. Lord of my heart. Not the generic God of the surrender prayer. The specific Father whose loving breast de Sales says the weight was ordained from in the first place.
You sit with the hand-over. Slowly. With the affections engaged. I am laying down this specific thing — by name — into Your specific hand — by name — and I am doing it tenderly, not with gritted teeth, because the cross came from a loving breast and is held by a loving hand.
You repeat the practice tomorrow. The weight will come back. The naming will be slightly easier the second time. The surrender will be slightly more honest. Over weeks, the all, all, all, without reserve becomes a real sentence rather than a piety. (If carrying it has been the mother-load of your last five years, a ‘let it go’ mom journal — 30 prompts for the things you’re done carrying is the prompts-form of this practice. If the finishable version of the work is what your week needs, a Christian women’s bible study you’ll actually finish is the on-ramp.)
That is the de Sales answer. It is slower than the bumper sticker. It is also, in his hand and in the hand of the saints who learned from him, the one that actually works.
Get Seven Days of Stillness — free
A free gift from Hayley Louisa Mark. A short devotional companion drawn from the 140-Day series — seven passages, seven contemplative practices, sent to your inbox over the coming week.
No noise. No spam. Unsubscribe whenever you wish.
The slow practice we just walked has its 140-day form in Devotional for Women in Their 40s.
