What Dies in Fénelon’s Dying-to-Self
⏱ 10 min read
You are afraid surrender will erase you, and you do not know which parts of you He wants to keep. The phrase dying to self has unsettled you for years. The Christian language of it suggests that the soul has to be flattened, the personality scrubbed off, the small loves and small particularities that make you you given up alongside the sins. You have hesitated at the door of surrender because the door, in the language you have inherited, sounds like an annihilation rather than a homecoming.
François Fénelon, writing in seventeenth-century France as a spiritual director to women in the court who held the same fear, would tell you — patiently, with the steady tenderness of a man who knew how easily the contemplative vocabulary could be misheard — that what dies in the surrendered soul is not the soul. It is the false self. The real self, the one He made, is the part He is giving back. The book where he names this most carefully is Spiritual Progress, his collected letters of direction. The Everspring Prayer Journal for Women is the 140-day companion practice this essay is the opening pages of — a quiet daily home in which the fenelon dying to self work can take, slowly, without the panic. For now — read slowly.
The fear is not unreasonable. The Christian tradition has, over centuries, used the language of dying and renouncing and losing-sight-of-self in ways that, read quickly, sound like the soul is being asked to disappear. Fénelon writes inside that tradition. He uses the language. But the way he uses it, when read at the speed it was written, makes a careful distinction the fast reading misses. There is a self that has to die. There is a self that does not. The conflation of the two is the source of the fear. The slow reading is the way out of it.
The first passage: renounce, forget and forever lose sight of self
The line that most reads, at first glance, as if Fénelon is asking for the annihilation of the person is this one:
“We must renounce, forget and forever lose sight of self, take part with Thee and shine, O God, against ourselves and ours; have no longer any will, glory or peace, but thine only; in a word, we must love Thee without loving self except in and for Thee.”
— François Fénelon, Spiritual Progress
Read it twice. Then read the last clause one more time, slowly. Love Thee without loving self except in and for Thee.
This is the hinge. Fénelon is not saying the self may not be loved. He is saying the self may not be loved as its own end. The self can still be loved. It must be loved — in Him, and for Him, as a creature He made and is making. The dying is not the dying of the person. The dying is the dying of the self that operates as its own centre, its own glory, its own measure, its own end. The verbs are precise. Renounce the self as ultimate. Forget the self as the constant subject of one’s own attention. Lose sight of the self as the figure at the centre of one’s own internal stage. What is being asked to die is not your particularity, your warmth, your loves, your laugh, your kindness, the way you make tea — none of that. What is being asked to die is the self-referential posture of a soul that has been living, even in its religion, as the protagonist of its own story.
The distinction matters because the fear of erasure is the fear of losing the wrong thing. The soul reads renounce, forget and forever lose sight of self and braces for the loss of the small loves that made her who she is. Fénelon, in the next breath, names what is actually at stake: the will, glory or peace the self was holding as its own. The will that has been running the show. The glory the self has been quietly storing for itself. The peace the self has been calculating on its own terms. These are the parts that die. The you He made — the laugh, the warmth, the particular way you noticed the cat in the morning — those are not the parts that die. Those are the parts He is going to give back, more fully and more freely than they have ever been yours.
The somatic — locating the self that does not have to die
Pause here. The teaching has a body to it.
Sit somewhere quiet. Let both feet press flat against the floor. Bring to mind one small particular thing about you that you love — the way you laugh at a particular joke, the small daily pleasure of the first cup of tea, the way you have always loved a certain kind of weather, the soft place you have inside you for one specific person. Hold the small particular thing in your mind. Notice that the body responds to it with a small inward warmth — somewhere behind the breastbone, a soft opening.
Now, holding the same small thing, let one slow inhale come in. On the exhale, let the inward sentence arise: This is His in me. He gave it. He is keeping it. Notice that nothing in the small particular thing has been threatened by the inward acknowledgement. If anything, the small warmth deepens. The part of you that you feared would die is not the part that dies. The part of you that you most love is the part He is most gently keeping. Stay with the small warmth for half a minute. Then continue reading. The body has just located the self that does not have to die.
The second passage: the simple, lovely, quiet vigilance
The second passage Fénelon sets next to the first — and the one that names what the surrendered soul actually does once the false self has been quietly let go — is the one on the two vigilances:
“If, then, we never lost sight of the presence of God, we should never cease to watch, and always with a simple, lovely, quiet and disinterested vigilance; while, on the other hand, the watchfulness which is the result of a desire to be assured of our state, is harsh, restless, and full of self.”
— François Fénelon, Spiritual Progress
Slow down at simple, lovely, quiet and disinterested vigilance.
This is what the soul is like after the false self has died. Simple — no longer complicated by the self’s need to manage itself. Lovely — Fénelon’s chosen adjective for the soul whose centre has vacated and been quietly inhabited by God; the loveliness is not the soul’s loveliness, but His showing through. Quiet — no longer noisy with the inward chatter of self-monitoring. Disinterested — the seventeenth-century word for not run by personal advantage; the soul is no longer calculating what she will gain from her devotion. The four adjectives describe the soul that has died to the false self and is, exactly because of the dying, more herself than she was before.
This is the part the fear cannot see in advance. The soul that has died to the self-referential posture is not flattened. She is freer. She is more herself than she has ever been. Her loves are still hers — only now she loves them in Him, and they come back to her with His blessing on them rather than her possession of them. Her warmth is still hers — only now the warmth has a deeper source. Her particularities are still hers — only now they are held by the One who made them rather than guarded by the self that was afraid of losing them.
The dying, in Fénelon’s hand, is the opposite of erasure. The erasure was what the false self was doing — slowly squeezing the real self out from underneath the management. The dying is the lifting of that management, so that the real self can finally breathe.
The daily slow work of this lifting is what the Prayer Journal for Women was built to hold. Not a discipline of forced renunciation. A small evening page in which the self, quietly, in the presence of Him, hands over the day’s small managements and is, again, lightly inhabited by Him — until the self-referential weight has been gently lifted off the real self and the real self is at last free to live the life He made for it. The 140-day shape is deliberate. The dying-to-self is not a single act. It is a slow daily lessening of the false self’s grip, in which the real self quietly emerges, more itself with every small evening yes.
(The sibling essays in this Fénelon cluster — What Fénelon Meant by Abandonment to God’s Will, Fénelon on the Difference Between Abandonment and Resignation, and Why Fénelon Said Self-Will Hides in the Holiest Things — walk the surrounding angles. Because the Fénelon cluster overlaps the Murray hub at the centre, What Andrew Murray Meant by Absolute Surrender and Andrew Murray on the Surrendered Will walk the same territory from the other side of the contemplative library.)
What actually dies, and what He keeps
Hold the two passages together. The first names what dies — the will, the glory, the peace held as one’s own; the self loved as its own end. The second names what remains — a simple, lovely, quiet and disinterested vigilance; a soul whose centre has been vacated by the false self and quietly inhabited by Him. The fenelon dying to self distinction, slowly walked, is the answer to the fear that surrender will erase you. It will not. It will erase the self that was, quietly, erasing you.
What dies is the management. What dies is the secret calculation of one’s own glory. What dies is the will that has been running the soul as its own little kingdom. What dies is the inward voice that has been narrating you to yourself for years, scoring your performance, monitoring your spiritual progress, checking the temperature of your faith. None of that, when it goes, is the part of you that you most loved. All of it, when it goes, is the part of you that has been most exhausting to carry.
What He keeps is what He made. The laugh. The warmth. The particular way you have always noticed a certain kind of light. The small loves the false self had been guarding too tightly. The capacity for delight. The capacity for sorrow. The way you make tea. The way you are, in your particular self, irreplaceable to the people who love you. None of that is asked to die. All of that is asked to be given back to Him, and returned to you, no longer held as your own possession but as His gift, freed of the anxious self-management that was, slowly, draining the colour out of them.
The dying-to-self, in Fénelon’s voice, is the return of the real self to itself, through Him. The fear that it is the opposite — that it is the loss of the real self — is the false self’s last defense. The slow daily practice is the patient un-believing of the fear, until what dies is at last only what was meant to die, and what is given back is the you He has been gently keeping the whole time.
The line worth keeping near the page
If you take only one sentence from Fénelon into the week ahead, take this one:
“We must love Thee without loving self except in and for Thee.”
Write it small. Put it where the fear of erasure will find it — by the chair, near the bed, inside the cover of the Bible. The question is not whether you will be able to die to yourself in one heroic gesture. The question is whether you will allow the small daily lessening of the false self’s grip to happen, knowing now that what is being asked to die is not the part of you He loves, and that the part of you He loves is exactly what He is keeping. Your job is not to perform the dying. Your job is to allow it, slowly, by daily small yeses. (Everspring Press is, in time, hoping to bring Fénelon’s letters back into a slow contemplative edition; for now the essays in this Fénelon library are the working library that reprint will be built on.)
Get Seven Days of Stillness — free
A free gift from Hayley Louisa Mark. A short devotional companion drawn from the 140-Day series — seven passages, seven contemplative practices, sent to your inbox over the coming week.
No noise. No spam. Unsubscribe whenever you wish.
The slow practice we just walked has its 140-day form in Prayer Journal for Women.
