What Is Regeneration in the Bible? — Edwards on the New Birth
⏱ 14 min read
The question surfaces, quietly, in the chair of the woman who has been a Christian for a long time. Has the new birth actually happened in me, or have I been performing what it would look like if it had? The question is not the question of an unbeliever. It is the question of a soul who has read the verses about being born again, who has listened to enough sermons to know that regeneration is the Spirit’s secret work, who has done the things that ought to follow — the baptism, the attendance, the years of devotion — and who, in the long afternoons of a hard season, still wonders whether the foundation under all of it has been laid by Him, or has been laid by her own attempted faithfulness on a ground that was never properly turned.
This is the slow version of the answer. Jonathan Edwards, the New England pastor and theologian who watched two Great Awakenings pass through his own congregation, wrote Religious Affections in 1746 specifically to give the church a way of telling the difference between the religious experiences that come from the Spirit’s regenerating work and the ones that come from somewhere else. The Everspring Bible Study Workbook for Women carries this kind of slow doctrinal reading into a daily companion, if you would like a place to take the practice after the article. For now — read slowly.
Edwards was a careful man. He had watched, in 1734 and again in 1740, the same scenes the modern reader might recognise from the bookshop: emotional revival meetings, weeping conversions, intense Sunday-evening commitments that did not survive the following Wednesday. He was not against feeling. He was a defender of feeling. He was, however, a careful pastor who had buried enough people to know that the feeling of being born again and the fact of being born again were not always the same. Religious Affections is the book he wrote to walk the careful distinction. The question what is regeneration in the Bible — in Edwards’s hand — is not the question of how loud the conversion was. It is the question of what kind of soil has been turned underneath the soul, and how you can tell. (For the contentment-companion to this regeneration essay, what does the Bible say about contentment? — Edwards on the sufficient God walks Edwards’s complementary account of settled affection. For the Wesleyan sister-treatment of the new birth, what does it mean to be saved? — Wesley on the new birth is the parallel essay. And if the daily-companion question is whether a small new-year practice could be the on-ramp, a new-year prayer journal for women — without the pretty-page pressure is the practical entry-point.)
Regeneration, in the Bible, is the Spirit’s quiet work of giving the soul a new principle of life — a new orientation in the deepest part of the person, a new affection toward God as God, a new tasting of holy things as actually sweet. It is not the same as feeling enthusiastic about Christianity. It is something deeper, slower, and more honest, and Edwards spent his life teaching people how to tell.
The first passage: the spirit breathed into the heart
“The more you have of a rational knowledge of divine things, the more opportunity will there be, when the Spirit shall be breathed into your heart, to see the excellency of these things, and to taste the sweetness of them.”
— Jonathan Edwards, Select Sermons
Read it once. Then read it again, slowly. Notice the verbs.
When the Spirit shall be breathed into your heart. This is regeneration in Edwards’s working vocabulary. Not when you decide to follow Jesus. Not when you raise your hand at the meeting. When the Spirit shall be breathed into your heart. The verb is in the passive voice because the soul does not do this. The Spirit does. Regeneration is, before it is anything else, the Spirit’s act on you. The soul does not regenerate itself any more than a body conceives itself. The new birth is something done to you by Another, and the to you is the whole point. You did not author it. You received it. The reception is what makes it new.
To see the excellency of these things, and to taste the sweetness of them. Edwards is doing precise work here. He is not saying you will agree the things are true. Agreement is the property of the unregenerate mind as well — the demons believe and tremble. Edwards is saying something stranger: the regenerate soul sees the excellency and tastes the sweetness. There is a quality of perception that arrives with the Spirit’s breath that was not there before. The same propositions about God become, suddenly, beautiful. The same texts of scripture become, suddenly, sweet. The same person of Christ becomes, suddenly, the One the soul most wants. This is the inward sign of regeneration in Edwards’s framework. Not the volume of emotion. The arrival of a new taste.
Notice the implication for the woman wondering whether the new birth has happened in her. The diagnostic is not did the conversion moment feel dramatic. The diagnostic is do the things of God taste sweet to me, in the long quiet of a Tuesday afternoon, when nobody is watching. Not do I agree they are true. Do they taste sweet. The taste is the Spirit’s signature. The taste is what regeneration leaves behind. The taste was not there before; the taste is here now; the difference is what scripture means by being born again.
This is also why Edwards, gently, insists that the rational knowledge of divine things is not the regeneration itself. The knowledge is the opportunity. The Spirit’s breath is the regeneration. The two work together — the more rational knowledge you have, the more material the Spirit has to use when He breathes — but the breathing is His. You can have decades of accurate knowledge and not have been breathed on yet. You can also, in less common cases, have very little knowledge and have been breathed on already, and the breathing-on will produce a hunger for the knowledge that builds the knowledge fast. The order is the Spirit, then the taste, then the steady inclination of the soul toward the One the taste has revealed.
For the Christian woman who has been wondering whether the new birth has happened, the first line of diagnostic is this: what tastes sweet to me when I am alone in the chair? If, after years of practice, the answer is Him — not consistently, not always, but in the deep settled inward sense — the breath has been given. If the answer is the performance of devotion, but not the One the devotion is for, the work may still be ahead. The diagnostic is not a verdict. It is information. The same God who gives the breath gives it on His own schedule, and the woman who has been faithfully showing up in a chair for years has not been showing up in vain.
The second passage: seeing Christ as the light of the world
The second passage is the one where Edwards names what the regenerate eye actually sees, when it sees:
“‘I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth on me, should not abide in darkness.’ Their believing in Christ, and spiritually seeing him, are spoken of as running parallel.”
— Jonathan Edwards, Select Sermons
Read it twice. Slowly. Notice the phrase running parallel.
Edwards is quoting John 12:46 and laying out a careful claim about the inner architecture of regeneration. Believing in Christ and spiritually seeing him run parallel — meaning, in Edwards’s reading, the two are not separable. The faith of the regenerate soul is not bare assent to propositions about Christ. It is a spiritual seeing of Him — an inward perception of the Person, not just the doctrine — and this seeing is what believing actually is, in the saving sense. Belief, in the New Testament’s vocabulary, is seeing. The soul has been given new eyes by the Spirit’s regenerating work, and the new eyes are the means by which faith now operates.
This is the second mark of regeneration in Edwards’s hand. The regenerate soul sees Christ as a Person, not as a doctrine. The unregenerate mind can hold the doctrine — knows the orthodox sentences, can pass the catechism, can identify the heresies — and never sees the Person. The regenerate soul, even when it does not know much doctrine yet, sees the Person through the doctrine, and the Person is what holds the soul. The doctrine is the window. Christ is what is seen through the window. Before regeneration, you can see the window glass. After regeneration, you see through the window to the One on the other side.
For the modern Christian woman, this is the diagnostic that quiets the question of whether you have believed enough. The question is not enough. The question is is there a Person at the centre of what I see, or only a doctrine. If, when you close your eyes at the end of the day, the inward sense is of a Person — present, attending, knowing this specific woman — the seeing has been given. If the inward sense is of a doctrine, correctly held but not personal, the breath may still be on its way. Edwards would not pronounce a verdict from the outside. He would tell you the seeing is what regeneration produces, and the seeing grows over years of slow faithful return to the One the eyes have been opened toward.
Their believing in Christ, and spiritually seeing him, are spoken of as running parallel. The two are not stages. They are the same act, looked at from two angles. The believing is the seeing. The seeing is the believing. The Spirit’s regenerating work is the giving of the eyes that do the seeing-and-believing, and once given, the eyes do not unlearn the seeing. The faith is the perception. The perception is the faith. There is no faith without the perception, and the perception is what regeneration leaves behind.
The somatic — feeling for the inward taste
Pause here. The teaching has a body to it, and the body is honest in a way the mind is not.
Sit somewhere quiet. Let both feet press flat against the floor. Let one hand rest, lightly, on the breastbone. Take one slow inhale. On the exhale, let the breath go all the way out, slower than the inhale.
Now hold the name Christ in the mind — just the name, not a verse, not a theology — and watch what the body does. Does the chest open slightly, as if it has been touched by warmth? Does the chest tighten, as if at the approach of an authority figure? Does it do nothing — the name passes through the mind without producing any inward register at all? The body has been carrying the inward state the soul cannot easily name. The body’s response to the name is a piece of information about whether the taste has been given yet, in Edwards’s sense — whether the Spirit has breathed in such a way that the Person on the other side of the name has become inwardly sweet.
The response is not a moral score. It is data. It can change. It does change, slowly, with daily small returns to the One the name names. Take one more slow exhale, the longer one. Take the hand away. Continue reading.
A daily home for the practice — between the second and third passages
The Everspring Bible Study Workbook for Women is built for the slow growing of the inward taste Edwards describes. Regeneration is the Spirit’s act; the daily small return is yours. The workbook is the chair the daily return happens in. A short passage. Room for the honest sentence. No demand to produce volume. The slow soil in which the seeing of Christ is fed by repeated, embodied exposure to the One the eyes are being opened toward. The cure is His. The room is yours.
The third passage: the way is plain — it is but sitting down
The third passage is the one that quiets the perfectionism that often masquerades as regeneration-anxiety. Edwards names what the regenerate soul does, once it has been given the eyes:
“‘The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart; that is, the word of faith which we preach.’ There is no need of doing any great work to come at this rest; the way is plain to it; it is but going to it, it is but sitting down under Christ’s shadow.”
— Jonathan Edwards, Select Sermons
Read it once. Then read it again, slowly. Notice the smallness of the verbs.
Sitting down under Christ’s shadow. That is what regeneration’s fruit looks like, in Edwards’s hand. Not climbing, not striving, not earning. Sitting down. The regenerate soul has been given the eyes to see Christ as the shadow under which the weary soul finally rests, and the response is not a louder activity but a quieter one — the coming and sitting. The new birth produces, in the long run, a soul that knows how to sit.
This is the part of regeneration that the modern Christian woman most often misses. She has been told the new birth produces zeal — and it does, in seasons — but Edwards is naming the quieter and deeper fruit. The regenerate soul learns to sit. Learns to rest. Learns to come under the shadow of the One whose presence is itself the rest. The zeal that does not eventually settle into this kind of sitting is the zeal Edwards watched in the Great Awakening that did not hold. The zeal that does settle into the sitting is the zeal that comes from a soul that has actually been breathed on. Both can look the same in week one. By year three, the difference is visible.
The way is plain to it; it is but going to it. The regenerate soul does not need an elaborate technique. The technique is the simplest possible thing — the small daily coming and sitting in His presence, without agenda, without performance. The breath that has been given will lead the soul, naturally, into this coming. The breath that has not been given may produce a great deal of activity without ever producing the sitting. The sitting is the sign. The sitting is the diagnostic. Edwards would tell you to watch your own inclinations over years, not minutes — and to see whether the inward pull, when you have a free hour on a Saturday, is toward more activity or toward more sitting. The regenerate soul, after years, finds itself pulled toward the sitting. The unregenerate soul, even when religious, finds itself pulled toward the production of more activity.
For the modern Christian woman wondering whether the new birth has happened, this is the third diagnostic. Over years, has your soul been learning to sit? Not perform, not produce, not lead, not teach — sit. Under His shadow. With no agenda. The growing capacity for this kind of sitting is one of the surest fruits of regeneration, in Edwards’s careful pastoral reading. It is also the fruit the modern church is least likely to celebrate, because it does not photograph. The sitting is, in Edwards’s hand, the slow visible signature of a soul that has been breathed on by the Spirit.
What this means for the way you have been asking the question
Most Christians who ask what is regeneration in the Bible ask it because they want a verdict — have I been born again or not. Edwards would not give you a verdict. He would give you a set of slow inward diagnostics and tell you to walk with them for a year. Does the name of Christ inwardly taste sweet to you? Do you see a Person through the doctrines, or only doctrines? Does your soul, over years, find itself drawn toward the small daily sitting in His presence, rather than only toward the production of more religious activity? The three together are the working signs of the Spirit’s regenerating breath.
If the answers are yes, yes, yes — in the deep settled inward sense, not the performed one — the new birth has been given. The growing of it is what your remaining years are for. If the answers are mixed, or not yet, or I am not sure, the breath may still be on its way, and the daily small showing-up in the chair is the place the breath is most likely to arrive. The Spirit blows where He wills. He does not blow on the souls that hide from Him. He often blows on the souls that have been quietly showing up, for years, to the same chair.
(The sibling articles in this contemplative-fathers series sit at what is the kingdom of God? — Augustine on the two cities and what is biblical hope? — Owen on hope that anchors the soul. The three together walk the doctrines the daily companion practice of the workbook is built to feed.)
What regeneration will actually look like in a year of slow practice
The new birth, in your day-to-day, will not look dramatic. It will look like the small re-arranging of inward tastes. The verses you read in February will taste slightly sweeter in November than they did at the start. The name of Christ, held in the mind in the small spare moments of the day, will produce a slightly warmer inward response in the autumn than it did in the spring. The pull, on a free Saturday morning, toward the chair and the open Bible — rather than toward another item of religious production — will be slightly stronger by year-end. These are not dramatic shifts. They are the slow inward signs of a soul on which the breath has either been given or is on its way. Edwards spent his life learning to read these signs. He would tell you to trust the slow ones over the dramatic ones, every time. The dramatic ones often do not hold. The slow ones almost always do.
Get Seven Days of Stillness — free
A free gift from Hayley Louisa Mark. A short devotional companion drawn from the 140-Day series — seven passages, seven contemplative practices, sent to your inbox over the coming week.
No noise. No spam. Unsubscribe whenever you wish.
The slow practice we just walked has its 140-day form in Bible Study Workbook for Women.
